Pakistan Cricket = Match Fixing Incidents ???

Tuesday, August 31, 2010

Disclaimer: I am sorry if i have hurt any Pakistani supporters feelings.

"Hey dude! Pakistan won the match!!"
"Huh! Probably the match was fixed!!"

This is the most general view of the Indian public. We associate probably all the victories of our "dear" neighbours!! Is it our hatred towards them or their close relationship with the word "Controversy", I am not sure. Well I too belong in the class of such thoughts and always love to see Pakistan loose (except when a loss could mean a world record victory streak of Australia)!!
Recent allegations against them further dents their reputation. A talented bunch of cricketers ,who excite the world with their sheer in-born talent are suddenly overshadowed by the ghost of Match fixing. All the credentials of a Mohammed Amer, Asif, Umar Akmal, Wahab Riaz are forgotten and they are seen as a bunch of guys who sold themselves. The incredible story of Zulqarnain Haider is suddenly forgotten amidst speculations and accusations. A great test series is suddenly forgotten.
Shahid Afridi couldn't have chosen a better time to retire as it saves him a number of uncomfortable press conferences. The new skipper ,Salman But, comes in and finds himself in the centre of all the debacle alongwith Amer and Asif whom ability to swing and seam the red cherry like a banana amazed spectators throughout the summer. The sting operation video ,operated by a British Tabloid, probably had more hits than the supposed money made by the players.
Pakistan's new found ability of getting bundled out 100 almost every time they batted in the test series against England seiously was sowing doubts in minds of the spectators and supportes (not mentioning their butter fingers which supposedly have become their speciality in the field!!). After the video was aired, not only Pakistan but also their opposition's reputation took blow.
Was Stuart Broad really good enough to outscore the entire Pakistan team in both innings?
Was it really Anderson or Pakistani batsmen themselves who made the pitch look like it had demons in it?
Was Pakistan's win over the Aussies really hard won or Australian palyers wanted to make some extra bucks?
Was Randiv's no-ball had some bigger reasons than denying Sehwag a ton?
Such questions will keep coming in cricket lovers mind. Australian cricketers had to come into press to state that they were clean.
The Cricket has taken a severe blow in the time of identity crisis for cricket itself. How can one take interest in watching a match whose result is probably decided and when one feels that he is just watching a recording of the match?
Is BCCI also somehow responsible for this incident because if they had allowed the Pak players to participate in the IPL, they too would have carried fat paycheques back home and probably wouldn't have required to make some extra bucks by falling through such lows?
Pakistan will keep on producing raw talents but such incidents will always be a spot on Pakistani Cricket, a question mark would be there on each individual after every every good or bad show. The ball of magic of new Pakistani quickie will raise doubts whether it was his mesmerising talent or some extra cash paid to the batter to make him look such. The huge six was the poof of the talent of the new mavrick of Pakistan or was it a bookie's gift through the bowler.

Its not only sad for Pakistan but all Cricket lovers.

Shame all the Culprits.

8 comments:

Anonymous at: August 31, 2010 at 11:42 AM said...

Ceasefire magazine: Why Pakistani Cricketers should not be prosecuted - http://ceasefiremagazine.co.uk/2010/08/modern-times-why-pakistani-cricketers-should-not-be-prosecuted/

{ Unknown } at: September 1, 2010 at 7:27 AM said...

Bro, Stuart Broad actually batted more sensibly than any other pakistani batter. But yes we can say that maybe pakistanis deliberately batted worse.No doubt pakistanis are very much talented but that doesn't mean they get rights to fix matches.I pray to god that we get to know the truth and the culprits be punished.

{ Bitanshu } at: September 1, 2010 at 8:48 AM said...

@aki
yeah Broad was excellent but it cud have been deliberate bad bowling too

LALA at: September 1, 2010 at 9:10 AM said...

i think if pakistan board starts giving very gud salary as BCCI or allow the restrictions they are put to , they will also stop doing match fixing.

{ paramjit } at: September 1, 2010 at 3:24 PM said...

Well, IMO this is nothing new and every board's player do it at some point of time or other. Pakistan's only misfortune is that it got caught and now they are calling for players like Aamer's head.....Also IMO , the other nations don't get reported as much and everything is swept nicely under the carpet. Yes , it is true that the spirit of the game has been badly hurt , but if we think logically , the spirit of the game is a vastly overrated concept. Does a batsman walk if he's nicked the ball and the umpire gives him not out? Can we then say that the umpire himself is not involved in spot fixing? Should the player be banned if he "cheats" by not walking? Cheating is cheating either way and in cricket it is done more often. The only way to clean up the mess is to ban Asif, Akmal, fine players who blatantly cheat/sledge regardless of their nationalities and then you would get a clean game. Also increase the salary of the poorer countries' cricketers. Put this into perspective: M.Johnson gets $1m as his yearly salary. M.Asif , who is a much better bowler in any condition gets $35k. So...

{ Bitanshu } at: September 2, 2010 at 6:30 AM said...

nice thoughts param

{ Unknown } at: September 2, 2010 at 8:06 AM said...

@bitansu: if had been for deliberate bad bowling, how come they took 7 wickets for 107??
the fixing started after that situation i think.

{ Bitanshu } at: September 2, 2010 at 9:31 AM said...

@Aki
i suppose after taking 7 wickets, they were now in position to fix!!
:D